100% Pass Quiz ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor - PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Authoritative Valid Exam Cost

Tags: Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Cost, Detail ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Explanation, Valid Study ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions, ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Question Explanations, Latest ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study Guide

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassLeaderVCE ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=19qKgV2pNsi1ywZ53VoXpcDyk5tKadNQz

You can install and use PassLeaderVCE PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps formats easily and start PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam exam preparation right now. The PassLeaderVCE ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor desktop practice test software and web-based practice test software both are the mock ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam that stimulates the actual exam format and content. With the PassLeaderVCE ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Questions you will get to understand ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam structure, difficulty level, and time constraints. Get any PassLeaderVCE PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam exam questions format and start PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam preparation today.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is a valuable credential for professionals who work in the field of Information Security Management. It demonstrates their ability to effectively audit an ISMS, identify weaknesses and vulnerabilities, and provide recommendations for improvement. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification is recognized globally and can open doors to new career opportunities and higher salaries. Additionally, it can help organizations ensure that their ISMS is in compliance with the ISO/IEC 27001 standard and improve their overall security posture.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Certification Exam is highly regarded in the industry and is recognized globally. It is a valuable credential for professionals who want to demonstrate their expertise in auditing ISMSs based on the ISO/IEC 27001 standard. PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam certification helps professionals to enhance their career prospects by opening up new job opportunities and increasing their earning potential. Additionally, it helps organizations to identify and select qualified professionals who can conduct effective audits of their information security management systems.

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor certification is recognized globally and is highly sought after by organizations that want to ensure the security of their information assets. With this certification, you will be able to demonstrate your commitment to maintaining the highest standards of security, and your ability to implement and maintain an effective ISMS.

>> Valid ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Cost <<

Detail PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Explanation | Valid Study ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions

God is fair, and everyone is not perfect. As we all know, the competition in the IT industry is fierce. So everyone wants to get the IT certification to enhance their value. I think so, too. But it is too difficult for me. Fortunately, I found PassLeaderVCE's PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam training materials on the Internet. With it, I would not need to worry about my exam. PassLeaderVCE's PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam Training materials are really good. It is wide coverage, and targeted. If you are also one of the members in the IT industry, quickly add the PassLeaderVCE's PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam training materials to your shoppingcart please. Do not hesitate, do not hovering. PassLeaderVCE's PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam training materials are the best companion with your success.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor exam Sample Questions (Q195-Q200):

NEW QUESTION # 195
A property of Information that has the ability to prove occurrence of a claimed event.

  • A. Electronic chain letters
  • B. Availability
  • C. Accessibility
  • D. Integrity

Answer: D

Explanation:
Explanation
A property of information that has the ability to prove occurrence of a claimed event is integrity. Integrity is one of the three main objectives of information security, along with confidentiality and availability. Integrity ensures that information and systems are not corrupted, modified, or deleted by unauthorized actions or events.
Integrity also implies that information and systems can be verified and validated as authentic and accurate.
Electronic chain letters are not a property of information, but a type of spam or hoax message that may contain malicious or misleading content. Availability means that service should be accessible at the required time and usable only by the authorized entity. Accessibility is not a property of information, but a characteristic of usability that refers to how easy it is for users to access and interact with information and systems. References: : CQI & IRCA ISO 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Course Handbook, page 24. : [ISO/IEC
27001 Brochures | PECB], page 4. : [ISO/IEC 27001 LEAD AUDITOR - PECB], page 13.


NEW QUESTION # 196
After a fire has occurred, what repressive measure can be taken?

  • A. Extinguishing the fire after the fire alarm sounds
  • B. Buying in a proper fire insurance policy
  • C. Repairing all systems after the fire

Answer: A

Explanation:
Explanation
A repressive security measure is a measure that aims to stop or limit an ongoing incident from causing further harm, or to restore normal operations as soon as possible. A repressive security measure can be a policy, a procedure, a device, a technique or an action that responds to an incident and mitigates its consequences.
Extinguishing the fire after the fire alarm sounds is an example of a repressive security measure, because it stops the fire from spreading and damaging more assets or endangering more people. ISO/IEC 27001:2022 defines repressive control as "control that modifies risk by reducing the consequences of an unwanted incident" (see clause 3.38). References: [CQI & IRCA Certified ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor Training Course], ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements, [What is Repressive Security?]


NEW QUESTION # 197
There was a fire in a branch of the company Midwest Insurance. The fire department quickly arrived at the scene and could extinguish the fire before it spread and burned down the entire premises. The server, however, was destroyed in the fire. The backup tapes kept in another room had melted and many other documents were lost for good.
What is an example of the indirect damage caused by this fire?

  • A. Burned documents
  • B. Water damage due to the fire extinguishers
  • C. Burned computer systems
  • D. Melted backup tapes

Answer: B


NEW QUESTION # 198
You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader guiding an auditor in training. You are testing her understanding of follow-up audits by asking her a series of questions to which the answer is either "true* or 'false'. Which four of the following questions should the answer be true"'

  • A. A follow-up audit is required in all instances where nonconformities have been identified
  • B. The outcome of a follow-up audit could be a recommendabon to suspend the client's certification
  • C. A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are minor
  • D. The outcome of a follow-up audit could lower a major nonconformity to minor status
  • E. The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to the individual managing the audit programme and the audit client
  • F. The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to top management and the audit team leader who carried out the audit where the nonconformities were initially identified
  • G. A follow-up audit is required only in instances where a major nonconformity has been identified
  • H. A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are major

Answer: C,E,F,H

Explanation:
A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are major. This is true because a major nonconformity is a situation that raises significant doubt about the ability of the organization's management system to achieve its intended results, and therefore requires immediate corrective action. A follow-up audit is necessary to verify the effectiveness of the corrective action and the conformity of the management system12.
A follow-up audit may be carried out where nonconformities are minor. This is true because a minor nonconformity is a situation that does not affect the capability of the management system to achieve its intended results, but represents a deviation from the specified requirements. A follow-up audit may be conducted to check the implementation of the corrective action and the improvement of the management system12.
The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to top management and the audit team leader who carried out the audit where the nonconformities were initially identified. This is true because the top management is responsible for ensuring the effectiveness and continual improvement of the management system, and the audit team leader is accountable for the audit process and the audit conclusions. The follow-up audit report should provide them with objective evidence of the status of the nonconformities and the corrective actions taken by the auditee13.
The outcomes of a follow-up audit should be reported to the individual managing the audit programme and the audit client. This is true because the individual managing the audit programme is responsible for planning, implementing, monitoring and reviewing the audit activities, and the audit client is the organization or person requesting an audit. The follow-up audit report should inform them of the results of the follow-up audit and any changes in the certification status of the auditee13.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2022 Guidelines for auditing management systems
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Information technology - Security techniques - Information security management systems - Requirements ISO/IEC 17021-1:2022 Conformity assessment - Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems - Part 1: Requirements


NEW QUESTION # 199
Scenario 1: Fintive is a distinguished security provider for online payments and protection solutions. Founded in 1999 by Thomas Fin in San Jose, California, Fintive offers services to companies that operate online and want to improve their information security, prevent fraud, and protect user information such as PII. Fintive centers its decision-making and operating process based on previous cases. They gather customer data, classify them depending on the case, and analyze them. The company needed a large number of employees to be able to conduct such complex analyses. After some years, however, the technology that assists in conducting such analyses advanced as well. Now, Fintive is planning on using a modern tool, a chatbot, to achieve pattern analyses toward preventing fraud in real-time. This tool would also be used to assist in improving customer service.
This initial idea was communicated to the software development team, who supported it and were assigned to work on this project. They began integrating the chatbot on their existing system. In addition, the team set an objective regarding the chatbot which was to answer 85% of all chat queries.
After the successful integration of the chatbot, the company immediately released it to their customers for use.
The chatbot, however, appeared to have some issues.
Due to insufficient testing and lack of samples provided to the chatbot during the training phase, in which it was supposed "to learn" the queries pattern, the chatbot failed to address user queries and provide the right answers. Furthermore, the chatbot sent random files to users when it received invalid inputs such as odd patterns of dots and special characters. Therefore, the chatbot was unable to properly answer customer queries and the traditional customer support was overwhelmed with chat queries and thus was unable to help customers with their requests.
Consequently, Fintive established a software development policy. This policy specified that whether the software is developed in-house or outsourced, it will undergo a black box testing prior to its implementation on operational systems.
According to scenario 1, the chatbot sent random files to users when it received invalid inputs. What impact might that lead to?

  • A. Loss of reputation
  • B. Leak of confidential information
  • C. Inability to provide service

Answer: A


NEW QUESTION # 200
......

Maybe you are a hard-work person who has spent much time on preparing for ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exam test. While the examination fee is very expensive, you must want to pass at your first try. So, standing at your perspective, our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor practice torrent will help you pass your PECB exam with less time and money investment. Our ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Valid Exam Dumps simulate the actual test and are compiled by the professional experts who have worked in IT industry for decades. The authority and reliability are without doubt. Besides, the price is affordable, it is really worthy being chosen.

Detail ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Explanation: https://www.passleadervce.com/ISO-27001/reliable-ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor-exam-learning-guide.html

BTW, DOWNLOAD part of PassLeaderVCE ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor dumps from Cloud Storage: https://drive.google.com/open?id=19qKgV2pNsi1ywZ53VoXpcDyk5tKadNQz

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *